Agni-V and the Science of Deterrence: Technology, Impact, and Strategic Balance

• The Agni-V missile combines advanced MIRV capability, three-stage solid propulsion, and canisterized mobility to provide India with a credible, survivable, and rapid-response nuclear deterrent.
• Launch angle modelling reveals trade-offs between range, apogee, flight time, and detection risk; lower angles optimise range and speed, while higher angles maximise altitude and warning time.
• Simulator studies show a 200-kiloton Agni-V strike on cities like Islamabad or Beijing would cause massive casualties, infrastructure destruction, and paralyse governance and economy, underlining its strategic deterrence role.
• Trajectory selection serves both technical and policy objectives, balancing operational effectiveness with deterrence credibility, command and control reliability, and strategic restraint.

The Agni-V Missile: India’s Shield of Deterrence

The Agni-V missile development is a milestone achievement in India’s strategic defence readiness, providing a reliable nuclear deterrent capacity against nuclear-capable rivals. Although its reported range of over 5,000 kilometres classifies it technically as an intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), its actual operational effectiveness hinges on the delicate dance between strategy and physics, not simply on range numbers.

This paper extends elementary range analysis to deliver a sophisticated, model-based study of launch parameters and their effect on the missile’s effectiveness. The analysis applies a “kill chain” paradigm, progressing systematically from launch to impact. It incorporates simulation of flight dynamics to determine range and accuracy. Warhead lethality and the likelihood of evading missile defences are rigorously assessed.

The study culminates in calculating the overall strategic deterrent effect. The grand thesis here is that launch angle is not just a technical parameter but a strategic knob, allowing planners to select between range maximisation, political safety, or tactical surprise.

Agni-V is the culmination of a strategic odyssey launched in the 1980s as a vision by leaders like Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam and further continued by scientists like Dr Avinash Chander. Its successful tests, such as the historic Mission Divyastra in 2024, which certified its Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicle (MIRV) capability, proved the capability of simultaneously deploying multiple warheads and saturating adversary defences. A cornerstone of India’s nuclear triad, the canister-launched and mobile Agni-V provides survivability and reiterates India’s No-First-Use policy through credible retaliation.

The philosophy behind Agni-V is indicative of the ideas of strategic thinkers like Bernard Brodie, who claimed that the function of the military in the nuclear era is “not to win wars but to avert them.” Likewise, Thomas Schelling characterised deterrence as the art of making war too costly for potential adversaries, something encapsulated in the annihilative potential of Agni-V. However, as Albert Einstein warned, nuclear weapons pose the ironic threat of reverting mankind to the primitive state of warfare. Ultimately, the real purpose of Agni-V is not to strike, but to make sure that war never happens at all. By establishing peace through the balance of terror, the missile is a weapon intended for deterrence, not for employment, India’s strategic stability shield in an unpredictable world.

Technical Potential of Agni-V: Motor, Survivability, and Mobility

The Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) designed and Bharat Dynamics Limited (BDL) produced the Agni-V missile, which is India’s cutting-edge long-range ballistic missile. It has an estimated unit price of ₹50 crore (US$6 million) and is road-mobile, rail-mobile, and canisterized, making it survivable, rapidly deployable, and minimising launch preparation time.

Physically, the missile is in the range of 50,000 to 56,000 kilograms, 17.5 meters long, and two meters in diameter. It is a solid-propellant, three-stage missile, designed to carry heavy payloads over vast distances. Agni-V can also deploy Multiple Independently Targetable Reentry Vehicles (MIRVs). While three to six warheads have been tested, it has reportedly been capable of carrying ten to twelve. Each warhead weighs between 3,000 and 4,000 kilograms, allowing simultaneous targeting of several sites and saturating enemy missile defences. This MIRV capability was tested in Mission Divyastra in 2024.

Driven by a three-stage solid rocket motor, Agni-V is reliable, with lower maintenance and rapid launch capability. Its range is between 7,000 and 8,000 kilometres, which makes it a near-ICBM. During terminal operation, it can speed off up to Mach 24 (29,400 km/h), making interception extremely difficult. For navigation, Agni-V combines a Ring Laser Gyroscope-based Inertial Navigation System (RLG-INS), multi-constellation GNSS (GPS, GLONASS, and NavIC), and dual-redundant micro-inertial navigation systems with a Circular Error Probable (CEP) of under 100 meters.

The missile can be fired from an 8×8 Tatra Transporter Erector Launcher or from a rail-mobile canisterized package, allowing flexibility and camouflage. Its canisterized system also provides environmental protection and nearly instantaneous readiness, adding to its position as the backbone of India’s strategic deterrent. Although it is classified as an ICBM because of its claimed range of more than 5,000 kilometres, a complex interaction between strategy and physics determines its actual operational impact. This study presents a detailed, model-based examination of how launch parameters, notably the launch angle, determine the missile’s performance, going beyond basic range calculations. We use a “kill chain” study, looking at every phase from start to finish. This entails estimating warhead lethality, the likelihood of evading missile defences, calculating range and accuracy by modelling the physics of flight, and assessing the ensuing strategic deterrent effect. The main argument is that the launch angle is a strategic dial rather than a set figure, giving planners the option to select between tactical surprise, political safety, or maximum range.

Feature	Details
Designer	DRDO
Manufacturer	BDL
Unit Cost	₹50 crore (US$6 million)
Mass	50,000–56,000 kg
Length	17.5 m
Diameter	2 m
Propulsion	Three-stage solid rocket
Warheads	3–6 tested, up to 10–12 (MIRV)
Warhead Weight	3,000–4,000 kg
Range	7,000–8,000 km
Speed	Mach 24 (29,400 km/h)
Guidance	RLG-INS + Multi-GNSS + redundant micro-INS
Launch Platforms	8×8 Tatra TEL, rail-mobile canisterized package

Theoretical Framework and Methodology

Three different ballistic missile trajectory types are depicted on the graph: normal (~45°), lofted (>45°), and depressed (<45°). The missile’s range, altitude, and flight duration are all determined by each trajectory, which is impacted by the launch angle. We can comprehend how multiple test launches validate different aspects of missile technology, including accuracy, re-entry stress, and penetration capabilities, by examining these profiles.

Key Formulas of Projectile Motion – The missile can be represented as a projectile under ideal circumstances, which ignore Earth’s curvature and air drag. Its motion is described by the following relations:

The Range-Angle Relationship and the Physics of Flight – The physics of motion under the curvature and gravity of the Earth dictates the trajectory of a ballistic missile like the Agni-V. The missile’s range (R) with a given beginning velocity (v0) for a spherical Earth.

Hence, the expression for the launch angle 𝜃 is:

This model, solved numerically, generates the fundamental range-angle curve, identifying the Minimum Energy Trajectory (MET).

Model of Warhead Lethality: Brode’s rules & HOB

Crucial Elements

• Yield (Y): Measured in kilotons, this represents the energy release of the nuclear weapon.
• Height of Burst (HOB): The altitude at which the warhead detonates, significantly affecting the blast pattern
• Damage radius (r): The distance from ground zero to a specific effect threshold
• Peak overpressure (ΔP): The maximum pressure wave at a distance (d) from ground zero

Strategic Consequences

For counterforce missions, the emphasis on peak overpressure as the primary criterion for eliminating hardened targets is especially crucial. In contrast to urban area targets, which are severely destroyed by 5–10 psi, hardened military targets, such as missile silos, command bunkers, and reinforced installations, require much higher overpressure levels (usually 100–1,000 psi).

Burst Optimisation Height

The HOB parameter is essential since it establishes the allocation of energy between:

• Air burst: Increases blast area and radius of thermal effects.
• Surface burst: Produces radioactive debris and maximises local destruction
• High-altitude burst: Produces effects of electromagnetic pulses (EMPs)

These correlations are integrated by contemporary systems such as NUKEMAP, which enable mission-specific optimisation by visualising damage patterns for various yields and HOB settings.

The plot of ICBM trajectory parameters versus launch angle demonstrates range, apogee, and flight time with increasing launch angle from 10° to 90°. The range is plotted up to 6000 km on the left axis, whereas apogee in kilometres and flight time in minutes are plotted on the right axis. The range curve shows that the missile covers approximately 3602 km at 10°, reaches a peak of almost 5493 km at approximately 20°, and then gradually decreases, coming to zero at 90° when the missile rises straight up and returns. This trend demonstrates that the actual optimum launch angle for greatest distance in the real world is significantly lower than the theoretical 45° under conditions in a vacuum, as atmospheric drag, the curvature of the Earth, and the necessity to leave the atmosphere in a hurry diminish the effective range at more acute angles. The apogee curve, on the other hand, increases smoothly and linearly with angle, from approximately 11.5 km at 10° to almost 161.7 km at 90°. This consistent increase is due to greater angles channelling more of the missile’s kinetic energy upwards, resulting in greater altitudes. The curve of flight time is similarly but subtly different: it increases very quickly at lower angles, from 15.5 minutes at 10° to approximately 40 minutes at 60°, then gradually increases towards an approximately 45.3-minute plateau at 90°. The flattening with more acute angles indicates decreasing returns, after most of the trajectory has a vertical direction, more altitude contributes less additional time than in lower angles.

Overall, these curves illustrate an underlying trade-off. Lower angles between 10° and 25° optimise range but maintain apogee and time aloft minimal, while more acute angles between 60° and 90° obtain high apogees and extended times aloft but at the expense of horizontal extent. This compromise is at the heart of the ICBM mission design. To hit a far target, 20° angles work best, while missions needing to reach higher altitudes, like evading interception or placing objects in space, utilise more sloping trajectories with less range. For defence, low-angle launches are more difficult to detect and intercept because they are faster and travel at a lower altitude, whereas high-angle launches offer greater warning time through apogees’ higher and longer-lasting flight times. Payload capacity is also impacted because higher apogee trajectories require more energy, which could restrict the mass lifted.

Distance Categories:

Short Range:        Below 4,000 km (10°-15°)

Medium Range:    4,000-5,000 km (15°-25°)

Long Range:           Above 5,000 km (20°)

Decreasing Range:   5,000-0 km (25°-90°)

The Physics and Human Impact of a Detonation Agni-V Warhead Impact Radius Comparison

The infographic contrasts the devastating effects of the 200-kiloton nuclear bomb carried by the Agni-V with those of a conventional 1,000 kg high-explosive warhead. The graph shows that nuclear explosions spread devastation across many kilometres, from fireball vaporisation to extensive thermal burns. In contrast, conventional explosions remain confined to much smaller areas with heavy damage restricted to a few hundred meters. This disparity is explained by the cube-root scaling equation governing blast physics.

Where, depending on the kind of damage being assessed, k is a constant, P is the reference pressure (often 1 atm), W is the explosive yield, and R is the radius of destruction. The important realisation is that the destructive radius does not rise in direct proportion to the cube root of yield. Therefore, the radius only doubles if the yield grows eightfold. In contrast to a 200-kiloton nuclear bomb, which is 200,000 times more powerful but only widens the blast radius by around 60 times, a 1,000 kg warhead, which is roughly equal to one ton of TNT, produces a blast radius of a few hundred meters.

This describes how the Agni-V becomes a true strategic deterrent when equipped with nuclear warheads, transforming it from a tactical weapon into a strategic one. Nuclear payloads provide the missile with its unmatched geopolitical significance because they can destroy entire bases, cities, and command structures in a single attack, while conventional payloads can only destroy localised targets.

Agni-V Warhead Impact Radius Comparison

Simulator Case Studies

Attack on Islamabad, Pakistan (200 kt Surface Burst)

If the Agni-V missile were fitted with a 200-kiloton nuclear warhead and exploded above Islamabad, the estimated effects are disastrous. The fireball produced at ground zero would reach a distance of 0.74 km, an area of 1.7 km², and everything inside this area would be vaporised immediately. Ringing outwards, the zone of heavy blast damage (20 psi overpressure) would extend to a radius of 1.27 km or approximately 5.09 km² and destroy even reinforced concrete buildings.

Radiation levels would be above 500 rem in a 2.02 km radius or 12.8 km², giving a virtually certain lethal dose to any unfortunate enough to be uncovered. A bit further away at 2.68 km (for 22.5 km²), the medium blast area (5 psi) would level most residential buildings and result in mass casualties. The broadest damage would be seen in the thermal radiation zone, where at a 5.3 km radius (88.1 km²), third-degree burns and firestorms could rage and burn large areas of the city.

The human cost of a single such attack is prohibitive: a projected 181,450 deaths and 184,930 injuries in hours. Additionally, approximately 640,000 individuals would be at risk in the general light blast zone (1 psi) during the initial 24 hours, overwhelming whatever limited emergency response capacity remained. In effect, such an attack would leave Islamabad utterly helpless—paralysing government control, obliterating infrastructure, and leaving the populace in a daze.

Attack on Beijing or Shanghai, China (200 kt Airburst)

If a 200-kiloton weapon were detonated in a densely populated Chinese city such as Beijing or Shanghai, the devastation would be far greater due to the sheer population density. The fireball, with a radius of approximately 0.74 km, would instantly vaporise the city centre. Within the heavy blast zone (20 psi, roughly 1.3 km), reinforced skyscrapers and steel structures would collapse, causing mass casualties. The surrounding radiation zone, extending nearly 2 km, would deliver lethal doses of radiation within seconds, fatally irradiating tens of thousands.

The medium blast radius (~2.7 km) would level residential blocks, with whole districts being reduced to rubble. The deadliest impact would be the thermal radiation range of ~5.3 km, subjecting millions in the city centre to third-degree burns and generating mass firestorms.

Casualty estimates are much larger than in Islamabad. Based on population density and height of detonation, deaths between 1.2 and 1.8 million and injuries up to 3–4 million could be anticipated. Apart from direct casualties, secondary effects would paralyse the city: hospitals wrecked, supply lines cut off, economic centres closed, and long-term radiation poisoning rendering recovery virtually impossible.

Strategic Implication

Upon comparing these simulator models, the actual character of Agni-V becomes clear. A normal 1,000 kg explosive warhead can target tactical targets like bunkers, bridges, or airstrips. However, a 200-kiloton nuclear payload gives Agni-V the status of a strategic-level system, capable of annihilating full capitals or industrial centres.

For Pakistan, that would result in Islamabad or Karachi being neutralised by one attack, essentially destroying national command and governance. For China, an attack on Beijing, Shanghai, or Guangzhou would immobilise the economy as well as the political-military command apparatus at the same time. The cube-root law of blast physics can describe why blast effects grow with yield, but the simulator data is what illustrates the ugly truth. Agni-V, with a nuclear warhead, is not merely a missile; it is a geopolitical leveller that puts India’s deterrence capability on par with the world’s leading nuclear nations.

Effect / Zone	Islamabad (Pakistan)	Beijing / Shanghai (China)
Fireball Radius	~0.74 km (1.7 km²) – city center vaporized	~0.74 km – dense urban core vaporised
Heavy Blast (20 psi)	1.27 km radius (5.1 km²) – concrete structures destroyed	1.3 km – skyscrapers & high-rises collapse
Radiation Zone (500 rem)	2.02 km (12.8 km²) – near-certain fatalities	~2 km – tens of thousands lethally irradiated
Moderate Blast (5 psi)	2.68 km (22.5 km²) – homes collapse, high casualties	~2.7 km – destruction of residential blocks
Thermal Radiation (3rd-degree burns)	5.3 km (88.1 km²) – massive burn injuries, fires	~5.3 km – firestorms in packed districts
Fatalities (est.)	~181,000	~1.2–1.8 million
Injuries (est.)	~185,000	~3–4 million
Population Affected (24h)	~640,000	>5 million
Strategic Effect	Neutralises Pakistan’s capital & command	Cripples’ governance & economy of a world superpower

Conclusion

This research shows that the launch angle is far more than a flight-dynamics parameter; it functions as a strategic lever that reshapes an ICBM’s operational envelope by trading off range, apogee, and time-on-target to influence effectiveness against missile defence, warning timelines, and political signalling. The Agni-V case study illustrates this clearly: while headline range figures carry symbolic weight, the true deterrent value lies in how launch parameters, guidance precision, MIRV capability, and survivable deployment converge to enable credible and sustainable retaliation.

Placed within the broader context of India’s nuclear posture, Agni-V is not an isolated asset but part of the nuclear triad — the land, sea, and air legs that together ensure redundancy, survivability, and a reliable second-strike capability. The triad’s core purpose is to make aggression prohibitively costly: land-based missiles like Agni-V offer swift, mobile, and precise retaliation; sea-based systems provide stealth and survivability; while air-delivered assets add flexibility and strategic signalling.

Put this way, the decision of trajectory is a policy tool as much as an engineering one: depressed or low-angle trajectories can reduce flight times and make defence harder, lofted or high-angle profiles can optimise survivability or political signalling, and canisterized mobility maximises uncertainty and increases an adversary’s cost of preemption. However, technical optimisation must be balanced with strategic restraint, as deterrence credibility ultimately depends on predictability, robust command-and-control systems, and doctrines designed to minimise the risk of unintended escalation. Hence, engineers and planners should employ launch-angle modelling to enhance credibility and survivability, while policymakers focus on transparency measures, secure command structures, and arms-control frameworks that reduce the scope for miscalculation.

Finally, the Agni-V and its flight-profile options capture the paradox of nuclear policy: the most stabilising position is frequently one that is powerful enough to be feared, but limited enough to be managed. Simulation of the strategic effect of launch angle thus fills in the gap between physics and policy — supporting more informed choices that maintain deterrence, maintain strategic balance through the triad, and minimise the risks of a more complicated security environment.

References:

1. _{https://nuclearsecrecy.com/missilemap/}
2. _{https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/}
3. _{https://www.newsweek.com/map-shows-range-india-agni-5-nuclear-missile-2117050}
4. _{https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2158574}
5. _{https://www.eurasiantimes.com/agni-5-missile-agni-v-test-displays-indias/}
6. _{https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/india-successfully-test-fires-agni-5-ballistic-missile-from-odisha/article69956842.ece}
7. _{https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/21/india/india-agni-5-missile-test-launch-intl-hnk}
8. _{https://missilethreat.csis.org/missile/agni-5/}
9. _{https://www.drdo.gov.in/drdo/technical-clusters/missiles-and-strategic-systems}
10. _{https://cenjows.in/agni-5-a-marvelous-achievement-the-big-game-changer/}