- Global entities are employing what is known as “fifth-generation warfare” against the Indian government in the run-up to the 2024 elections in a bid to upstage the current dispensation.
- Infowar against the Indian government involves unconventional tactics, including disinformation campaigns and funding disgruntled elements, aimed at inciting civil unrest and ultimately destabilizing law and order.
- The involvement of the “Global Cabal”, an organization of corporate elites, American and European advocacy groups and the international media to target India makes the narrative all the more complex.
- While the debates about foreign influence and international agendas persist, India’s trajectory remains determined by its domestic policies, diplomatic efforts, and commitment to democratic values.
In the rapidly evolving landscape of Indian politics, the upcoming 2024 Lok Sabha elections have emerged as a pivotal moment that not only shapes the nation’s domestic trajectory but also garners attention on the international stage. As the Indian National Congress faces this electoral litmus test, discussions have transcended national borders, drawing the interest of global figures and organizations. Among these voices is the renowned Hungarian-American billionaire investor and philanthropist, George Soros, whose views on India’s democracy and civil liberties have sparked debates and reflections.
This article delves into the intricate interplay between international perspectives and India’s political landscape, shedding light on the multifaceted dynamics that are poised to influence the outcome of the 2024 elections. From the alleged involvement of Soros’ Open Society Foundations to the nuanced manoeuvrings of the so-called Global Cabal, this exploration unravels the global forces shaping India’s electoral scenario and underscores the significance of India’s position in the international arena.
Soros criticised the Indian government’s crackdown on civil society groups and accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s administration of resorting to fear tactics and divisive rhetoric to consolidate power. He highlighted the importance of safeguarding democratic principles and upholding civil liberties. This speech placed Soros at the centre of discussions about India’s political landscape, as his remarks were widely debated and analyzed in both national and international contexts.
Adding to the intrigue, Soros made a statement at the Munich Security Conference in February 2023, suggesting a close alliance between Modi and business magnate Gautam Adani. This assertion gained attention, especially when considered alongside allegations made by US short-seller Hindenburg Research against the Adani Group. The timing of Soros’ statement and the allegations against Adani raised eyebrows and fueled speculations about a possible larger agenda at play.
Soros’ Open Society Foundations have often been accused of engaging in activities that disrupt governments and regimes. These allegations have led to discussions about the true nature and scope of the foundation’s activities. Critics argue that Soros uses his substantial wealth to support various causes and groups that align with his vision of open societies and democratic governance. However, sceptics view these activities as covert attempts to influence political landscapes and destabilise governments.
In the context of India, Soros’ Open Society Foundations have been accused of contributing to disruptions and regime changes. His substantial pledge of one billion dollars to counter nationalist sentiments in India has raised questions about his intentions and the impact of his involvement. Soros has criticised policies such as the Citizenship Amendment Act and developments in Kashmir, citing concerns about civil liberties and minority rights.
The connections between Soros’ foundations and Indian figures have only added to the intrigue. Reports suggest that the Global Vice President of the Open Society Foundations, Salil Shetty, marched alongside Rahul Gandhi during his Bharat Jodo Yatra. This association has sparked discussions about the foundation’s potential influence on Indian politics.
Additionally, individuals such as Harsh Mander, who is reported to have strong links with the Soros Foundation, and Amrit Singh, a human rights lawyer for the Open Society Justice Initiative and daughter of former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, have further deepened suspicions about the foundation’s role in shaping India’s political landscape.
Critics argue that the Open Society Foundations are employing what is known as “fifth-generation warfare” against the Indian government. This form of warfare involves unconventional tactics, including disinformation campaigns and funding disgruntled elements, aimed at inciting civil unrest and ultimately destabilizing law and order. The foundation’s alleged involvement in organizing farmer protests and other similar activities has prompted debates about the extent of its influence and the motivations behind its actions.
The narrative becomes more complex when considering the involvement of what has been termed the “Global Cabal,” an organization of corporate elites. This group is said to be using American and European advocacy groups to target India in information warfare. Recent events, such as the Seattle City Council’s decision to protect ‘caste’ as a category and attacks on Hindu temples in Australia allegedly by extremist elements funded by Sikh For Justice, have further fueled suspicions of external interference.
In this landscape of international intrigue and alleged influence, the role of the media cannot be ignored. The BBC’s coverage, for instance, has come under scrutiny for its portrayal of Prime Minister Modi’s actions and the government’s handling of various issues. Accusations of bias and misrepresentation have led to debates about media ethics and the broader narrative surrounding India’s political developments.
China’s reported activities in the region, including building settlements and funding rebellious elements, have also added a geopolitical dimension to the discussions. The alleged attempts to influence political outcomes in neighbouring countries have raised concerns about India’s regional security.
Furthermore, the involvement of advocacy groups such as the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC) and the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in the United States has led to accusations of attempts to manipulate public opinion and create a distorted image of India. These groups have repeatedly targeted organizations like the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), accusing them of promoting a Hindu supremacist agenda.
Academic institutes funded by globalist organizations have also been accused of conducting campaigns against the Hindu community, attempting to tarnish the multicultural fabric of India. These campaigns are seen as divisive and exclusionary, potentially leading to communal tensions.
Amid this complex narrative, incidents like stone pelting on Vande Bharat trains have raised concerns about the security of vital transportation infrastructure. The idea that such actions could be part of a larger plan to disrupt essential services and create chaos has sparked discussions about the motivations behind these incidents.
The international attention on India’s political landscape has also led to discussions about diplomatic engagements and foreign intervention. Reports of meetings between opposition leader Rahul Gandhi and foreign officials, along with comments by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey, have prompted debates about the potential implications of such engagements.
Interestingly, the Bilderberg Meeting, an annual conference that brings together influential figures from various sectors, has emerged as a focal point in discussions about international influence. The recent meeting, which focused on topics ranging from artificial intelligence to energy transition, included discussions about India’s trajectory. Notable attendees included individuals with expertise in international affairs, adding a layer to the debates about external involvement.
Despite these challenges and alleged attempts at influence, India’s diplomatic efforts and initiatives have garnered international recognition. From vaccine diplomacy to extending humanitarian aid, India’s role in global affairs has been noted positively. The country’s pursuit of growth and development, along with its commitment to principles like “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam,” which signifies a global family, has positioned India as a leader among developing nations.
While the debates about foreign influence and international agendas persist, India’s trajectory remains determined by its domestic policies, diplomatic efforts, and commitment to democratic values. As the 2024 Lok Sabha elections draw closer, the nation’s political landscape continues to evolve amidst a backdrop of global intrigue and speculation.
(The author is a post-graduate student in International Relations at Kalinga University, Raipur. The opinions expressed are the author’s own)
Dr. Niranjan B Poojar 
Bhagyashree Gupta